You are still very weak with language (not that I'm so strong, mind you). You've dropped the ball concerning Clinton's dasturdly lies per me, and offered up a very incomplete analysis of leaks to China by introducing Loral, which I hadn't mentioned (though reading your post alone, others might easily falsely assume I had). That the Loral CEO was investigated and punished, has no obvious direct bearing upon Clinton's guilt or innocence, despite your fallacy of a sentence in which you appear to allege such.
I also used the word "perhaps," which leaves some blessed doubt, you see (but I guess you didn't). The major point of my post was that Clinton did far worse than play around with sexual relations. I established this without need of the China issue, and you have not really countered even that. We KNOW Clinton called honest women liars over and over, and I don't care if the issue was concerning whether he met them and played poker with them, the fact is he claimed they lied when he knew they hadn't, and he did it to cover his political butt. They were citizens wronged by a greedy politician. Disgusting, and coming from a President, absolutely he should have been convicted, IMHO, in George Washington's honest 'ol USA where now-a-days, I THOUGHT even women had rights.
Dan B. |
