SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A Little Forum For Gold Microclusters

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Josephus who wrote (75)9/9/1997 9:54:00 PM
From: Michael J. Wendell   of 142
 
Jody, Gee Whiz, you learn fast. Perfect rigid structure. Perfect energy transfer. A diamond is an overgrown cluster. Its size is its only weakness. You may become a believer. Does your favorite lady friend believe in diamonds? A diamond is carbon. So is coal and graphite. Your favorite ladyfriend is probably more into clusters than coal, once she knows the difference. And chemically and physically, the sparkley form is also different than coal.

Hudson's description of superconductors may or may not make sense. If you take a 200 atom cluster and knock an hit it with an electron at one end and another electron leaves at the opposite end, you have the resistivity of the elemental form divided by 200. Except that they do not conduct to each other because if their individualism. They are really loners in the true sense of the word.

And yes my true buckyball buckeroo, electron clouds are the clusters we have all been looking for, but first find the "bird nests on the ground". These darn ruckus making cyotes can't all be wrong. Put the right spin on that one. All together now. Have a good evening mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext