SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (243753)7/27/2005 8:59:34 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (4) of 1575885
 
Actually, it is firmly rooted in science. Think about the scientific method. Form a hypothesis and then test it. If you can't figure out a way to test it, then what can your conclusion be? It can only be that you have no evidence to prove or disprove the hypothesis. If you put this in the context of the hypothesis that God does not exist, then your conclusion has to be that you can't prove or disprove it. Therefore, you can claim to be an agnostic.

Atheists on the other hand profess that there is no God. That implies that they have proof there is no God, when we all know that no such proof exists.

So who do you think is more scientific in their thinking, the atheist or the agnostic? It's the agnostic, clearly.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News