Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (129123)	8/1/2005 7:05:24 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) of 793843

That would dispose of that particular objection. OTOH apparently there was some objection to capturing the image of the driver. I'm not sure what the specific objection was, something about privacy probably. I'm not sure I share the objection, at least not the extent that it would be enough to cause me to not support red light cameras if I would otherwise support them. In VA they aren't as bad as DC. They are less common, and I believe you only get a fine, not points. (I wonder about insurance though, does the insurance company get the records and treat them the same as if there where points involved, in terms of raising your rates?). Also I haven't heard of as many games played with short yellows or putting the cameras on lights near the bottom of a steep hill. If I could be talked in to supporting any of these cameras, it would be red-light cameras over speeding cams. I'm not convinced that the speeding cams can be reliable enough, plus I think many speed limits are too low so I'm not for aggressive enforcement by any method. Still at this time I'm not a supporter of red light cameras either. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next