SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (129622)8/3/2005 10:21:21 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 793838
 
By what logic do you proffer that ID says, "we would say that "God" did it this way, and we can't know more."

ID in no way precludes understanding what we do not understand now, at some time in the future. I can see no logic in proffer ID suggests one cannot figure out in the future what we do not understand now. To me ID says, God somehow arranged it and we do not fully understand yet how it is arranged. But it works.

ID is the only route I know now that does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. At the nutty Quantrum Physics level how does one explain how trillions of atoms organized themselves into a gene that is part of cell that can duplicate itself doubling it's complexity. That's one of many millions of monster gaps in evolution.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News