SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (244759)8/4/2005 2:27:07 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) of 1574005
 
So the public pays for her indiscretions (and that of the father).

If a public that tells a pregnant woman (who wants to have an abortion) that she can't (the public makes it illegal) that same public shouldn't also force her to raise the child she doesn't want, right?

Are you also against the ability of a mother to give up a newborn for adoption? I don't think so. So if you are going to prevent her from having an abortion (her first choice), then you have to pay the cost of her not having the abortion. She pays the operation cost, and the public pays the Fetus Preservation Machine and orphanage cost.

If the public is not willing to pay these costs, they shouldn't be able to ban abortion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News