Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (244827)	8/4/2005 12:40:25 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (3) of 1576166

tejek, re:Bush Remarks Roil Debate on Teaching of Evolution I do not share Bush's fundamental belief in ID nor should it be taught with equal stature - I think it's wrong and when compared in the light of day in a class room setting I believe it's obviously not a factually supported idea - creationism has been updated into an attack against evolution and renamed ID. From the article and what I read on their www.discovery.org web site - "if you look at their theological and scientific writings, you see that the movement is fundamentally anti-evolution." It still belongs historically before evolution and should be "taught" in the context of pre-evolution theory or as science history. Much like the flat earth idea's of other peoples - it's a part of history. Perhaps we're not connecting on the word teach - Bush is wrong to believe this should be taught along side evolution, I believe it should however be taught before evolution to contrast the development of evolution. So perhaps my position is best stated as don't ban the theory from the class room - but don't elevate it to the same level. It's sure hard to defend an idea I don't believe in. <g>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next