Yes, and my point is, the treated group had a much lower mortality rate and than that found in ANY other CHF trial.
My cup is half full while your's is half empty!
And you don't have to caution me on the risks. I've voiced my opinions on this for many years... had serious concerns of VAs's beginnings, one of it's ingredients, Aids, and all the other things you mention here and there.
I have also, over the years, concluded that VAS has no skeletons in its closet, and that it is a good bet, but at all times... Gamble what you can afford to loose.,,, unlike many over there.
btw, I also respect some shorts. I have found some to be knowledgeable on the co. they bash/support/instigate, before they open their mouths. Enough to make it as clear as mud!
Stick around here and there, we have very knowledgeable posters who can technically address many negatives you have... as you appear to like quoting negative statements / reports which have no scientific support.
cheers |
