Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (130274)	8/7/2005 11:45:31 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 793741

<We kill and eat passive, non-threatening and easy to kill cows too. Ditto for chickens and salmon.> And look what happens to vast wheat and corn fields. Mowed down by a row of combine harvesters, but they do get a really excellent life, with fertilizer and sun and water and no pests allowed to eat them. If hen, salmon, sheep and cow happiness per capita is multiplied by how many there are, and compared with tiger happiness per capita times how many there are of them, the tigers would be the losers by a very long way. In human happiness per capita terms and adjusted for population, I dare say India would far exceed the USA where Prozac consumption and anxiety are endemic. Not to mention obesity worries, which are still relatively uncommon in India. I'm not sure ants can be in the competition because I doubt they have happiness neurotransmitters as a measurable factor. If they did, they'd be doing very well. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next