Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (130296)	8/7/2005 11:48:53 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 793672

Not only is it not unique to the Times but, for good, intelligent reporters, it's almost impossible to separate the two. That's why I don't see what Keller is saying. If you, for instance, take as a model, John Burns' reporting from Iraq. Burns is one of the best reporters of our times and of The Times. There is not an article from him that is not a welcome mix of commentary and coverage. Only news organizations like the AP in which reporters become cyphers is there an absence of commentary (save for its inevitability in any speech act). And no one buys the AP to understand what's happening.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next