History's effect on Religion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : History's effect on Religion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (305)	8/11/2005 2:45:12 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 520

Did you know that 340 A.D. was the fourth Century? "In other words, just because my copy of Bible is printed in 2002, it does not mean Bible is a 21st C forgery." If there were no literary or historical basis for the claims then it might indeed be. I noticed the preceding partial texts that it is claimed the Thomas document is based on, do not in fact match the Thomas document so there are only similar snippets before 340 A.D.. If you think something written in the fourth century should be considered to supersede a first century document like 1Corinthians when the two are mutually exclusive you will have to produce more that bare assertions to demonstrate that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next