SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sandintoes who wrote (446)8/12/2005 8:19:47 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 3029
 
Any limitation on term of service of Article III judges (those whose terms are set by Article III of the Constitution) (that is to say, for life, under good behavior, which is most federal judges in federal trial courts (but not administrative law judges)) would, in my opinion, require a Constitutional amendment.

Yes, it's true that (in general) judges are paid less than lawyers. Many, if not most, judges were pretty well off before they went on the bench, and see their service on the bench as a higher calling.

The same is true with respect to most Presidents, most Senators, many Congress Critters, and many Secretaries of federal agencies e.g., Secretary of Defense, and so forth.

If any sitting Justice envies the grass on the other side of the fence, the alternative is clear, and no doubt the law firms would love to have them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext