Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (132255)	8/13/2005 7:25:41 PM
From: Whitebeard	Read Replies (1) of 793818

If I didn't say "illegal" before every use of the word "immigrants," please, excuse me. But I don't know what difference it makes when you have "blanket amnesty" under Reagan, which was suppose to fix the problem back in the early eighties, and was just trading citizenship for votes. Remember that? And now you have Bush's "bracero" program, which is just more pandering to the Hispanic vote. These politicos keep it up, citizenship isn't going to be worth more than it takes to buy a vote. It is dogma among Republican activists that Hispanjics are the future of the party, eg. Peggy Noonan's recent article. I heard the same damn thing from David Horowitz eight years ago. Shhh, Republicans can't talk anout illegal immigration for fear of being smeared with racism and losing the Hispanic vote. Shhh. Look at what happened to Pete Wilson when he backed Prop. 228. That's why the party is in such trouble in California. Bull pucky. The moral argument has to be framed in such a way that it permits the borders to be closed. Not the excuses that advocates are coming up with now.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next