Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (132140)	8/13/2005 8:14:52 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) of 793757

Holt said: It's unlikely that the terrorists could do anything to top 2700. That makes the Soviets the greater threat First of all, thank you for the word definition instruction on "threat" and "history". Secondly, I suspect that your 2700 number is a tad low. Third, did you forget or choose to overlook the 1993 WTC bombing where 6 died and over 1000 were injured? How about the attempted Millennium Eve bombing of LAX? That was the one the French figured out for us since the "gorelick wall" prevented a timely exchange of info. Of course, the clinton's happily took the credit for stopping this disaster. All these events were conducted members of AQ. Finally, I'm not taking issue with cobalt's concern about h. clinton as president. I probably share her viewpoint. I was merely questioning cobalt's opinion on who is the greater threat - the communists or the terrorists (read AQ). It is patently obvious to the casual observer that AQ is the greater threat. What the soviets "could have done" is meaningless today. As you said, it is "history".

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next