SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (132648)8/15/2005 3:35:07 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) of 793838
 
kholt, Somewhere along the line, somebody missed a post, or so. I did acknowledge the impressive nuclear arsenal that the Soviets had, and stated that they were not going to use it for all the reasons already posted, and that they had too much to lose in a bomb to bomb exchange. That there is two of the legs.

Then I talked about the rear end of the horse, being the terrorists, and that they have nothing to lose, and were more apt to cause damage to America, than the Soviets. That's the other two legs that get the dung on them.

As powerful as the USSR was, they never bombed a target in America, or Spain, or England. That tells you that their saber was made of wood instead of steel. Remember how easy it was to spend them out of business.

What else is there to say without becoming redundant?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News