SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (37986)8/15/2005 7:09:25 PM
From: Elroy JetsonRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
In short, the shuttle is returning empty. And this is the least expensive way to dispose of trash. The alternative would require the space shuttle to allocate part of their cargo space on the way up for trash rockets or other propellant. Sending the trash back to earth is free, sending it out into space would be quite costly.

Why? Sending the waste either into space, toward the sun or earth would require some form of rocket or other energy.

Merely throwing it or pushing it in the desired direction would send the space station in the opposite direction. This would take the same amount of propellant to correct the space station's orbit as it would have to propel the trash in the first place, while jeopardizing the stability of the space station.

You can eliminate this problem by simply letting the trash slowly float away, but in using this method, the trash will remain in orbit about as long as the space station itself, maybe a hundred years.

This is not a cosmetic problem, but a highly dangerous object capable of destroying spacecraft. The trash when it floats away from the space station is travelling at 17,000 miles per hour relative to a rocket leaving earth vertically. Even a small piece of frozen urine fired at your automobile at 17,000 miles per hour would likely kill you and rip apart your car. Spacecraft are no different.

NASA spends a great deal of money tracking the location of orbital debris, like an air traffic controller, to keep spacecraft safe. Cluttering up the orbital field of earth with more trash would be highly expensive.

nasa.gov

.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News