SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (35450)8/16/2005 3:06:02 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
How stupid the guy with rolled up kings was depends on what came on 4th and 5th street. If the guy hits 2 low cards, then yeah, he was an idiot. If he filled up along the way and the other guy missed his draw, then no, he wasn't an idiot. I don't think he had anywhere near the advantage that he thought, but OTOH, that doesn't mean he shoulda chucked the hand from the start either.

I could not disagree more.
He was stupid to get involved in a two way game risking $3000 to win $100. I do not care what happend on the 4th and 5th cards. It was a two way hand from the first bet and raise before the 4th card was dealt. In short he had everything to lose and nothing to gain. When he was raised $500 and everyone else dropped, the hand was over. It would have been smart to toss it right there on a risk reward basis IMO even if the odds were big that he would split. In fact, betting the initial $500 was a mistake IMO.

I bet KT agrees.

BTW before the 4th card was flipped I actually said to myself this guy has three kings and he is going to regret it. I sensed the outcome of the hand and had to wait for 4 more cards to see it.

Mish
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext