SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (246343)8/17/2005 10:16:50 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 1572108
 
Neanderthals are not part of our ancestry? Can you tell I don't have a science background?

There is still some wiggle room. Only a portion of Neanderthal mitocondrial DNA (mDNA) was sequenced. Since mDNA passes down the maternal line without modification, if any living human was descended from a Neanderthal female, we would find modern human mDNA that should closely match this 25K year old Neanderthal mDNA. Unfortunately, the amount sequenced so far would seem to place the differences as two great. IIRC a plot of the differences has the distribution of humans, neanderthals & chimps forming distinct clusters with the human-neanderthal difference being about 20-30% of the human-chimp difference.

There is some hope of sequencing actual neanderthal chromosomal DNA, but I don't know what stage that is at. It will be very interesting if this is successful, with implications for the creation/evolution debate, as currently creationists either lump neanderthals as human or ape, the world being necessarily binary in that regards form their POV. The genetics will place it somewhere in an island of its own, but closer to humans is my WAG based on the mDNA results so far.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext