SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Err America: They Report, They Decide
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rock_nj who wrote (329)8/18/2005 7:42:32 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 1513
 
"Can say with a straight face that you are not biased in your opinions?"

Nope! Unlike you I openly admit I'm biased.

And unlike you I feel no need to pretend I'm not biased while
continuing to expose a clear liberal bias for all to see -
I.E., making precisely the same arguments justifying the lack
media coverage of the Air Ameriscam scandal while
simultaneously applying the exact same standards justifying
wide media coverage of Rush Limbaugh. In case you missed it,
neither party has yet been convicted of breaking any law
although a court has found that Air Ameriscam was"engaging
in a "sham transaction" and "fraudulent conveyance" of
assets in order to avoid paying its debts".

Also, unlike you I candidly factor my bias into discerning &
filtering credible evidence from false, blatantly distorted,
intentionally misleading agenda driven assertions &/or
unsubstantiated OPINION disguised as fact.

And unlike you I generally do not insert my biased opinions
into discussions without having at least some detailed
knowledge of the issue being discussed nor without the
ability to substantiate my POV with credible evidence.

Additionally, unlike you, when faced with credible evidence
that clearly undermines my POV, I do not continue to push my
now discredited POV unabated &/or change the parameters of
the debate to deflect them away from the flawed POV I had
been asserting was credible (both of which is precisely what
you have done in your reply to me BTW). Instead, I willingly
admit this information undermines my POV, then I change my
POV to reflect the reality of this additional credible
evidence.

Like I said, come back when you are ready to discuss the
issues based on reality, unclouded by your obvious liberal
bias.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News