...."Great, so you're saying that you are incapable of rendering a fair opinion and unbiased opinion due to your political bias?"....
Time to add reading comprehension problems to the list of
things that keep you from engaging in objective, reality
based, informed debate.
From my reply to you, ET AL, I said,
Also, unlike you I candidly factor my bias into
discerning & filtering credible evidence from false,
blatantly distorted, intentionally misleading agenda
driven assertions &/or unsubstantiated OPINION disguised
as fact.
And unlike you I generally do not insert my biased
opinions into discussions without having at least some
detailed knowledge of the issue being discussed nor
without the ability to substantiate my POV with credible
evidence.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21615335
I won't waste my time debunking anything else from your
feckless, factless & mostly baseless opinion laced response.
I will note however, you continue to make the same lame
arguments justifying the lack media coverage of the Air
Ameriscam scandal while simultaneously applying the exact
same standards justifying wide media coverage of Rush
Limbaugh, among other baseless, albeit unsubstantiated
OPINIONS. In case you missed it, neither party has yet been
convicted of breaking any law although a court has found that
Air Ameriscam was "engaging in a "sham transaction"
and "fraudulent conveyance" of assets in order to avoid
paying its debts".
Please let me know when you are able to engage in
substantively objective, reality based discourse.
EOD |
