SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elsewhere who wrote (169360)8/19/2005 8:48:08 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Then you should be able to substantiate that skepticism. The configuration of enrichment plants is very different depending on its purpose. So this is not something that can be hidden. And to remove the uranium, you have to shut down the plant. It is easy to put material guarantees into the agreement in the form of say, requiring inspectors to be present while a plant is shut down and restarted. And to have 24hr monitoring equipment and cameras in the plant. In addition to these and other intrusive inspection regimes that Iran has agreed to, Iran also offered two other suggestions: first, the plants can be built as joint ventures with permanent European board of directors and management in place to monitor the on-going business of the plants. Second that the parliament would pass laws barring military use of nuclear material. But if none of this is still good enough, then it is EU that should state what guarantees it needs. So far it has not done that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News