PYNG Technologies Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pictouislander who wrote (7711)	8/21/2005 12:59:48 PM
From: Jack Rayfield	Read Replies (2) of 8117

pictouislander you and naturalperson just don't get it stating the facts is not bashing. The information that LOR presented is fact and just because it doesn't match up with you expectation and the tone of the PRs issued by Pyng lately is the whole point that has always been the case and the longtime posters just recognize it and are cynical of anything said by Mike. If you do not believe LOR figures represent all sales to the military why don't you call Mike and get clarification and find out what the actual breakdown of military sales to civilian sales are for this year and last year. If LOR's info is so bad it looks like Mike would be falling all over himself to point out LOR's false information. The fact that he has not gives further credibility to LOR numbers not to mention they come from a total unbiased source the US Government which provides the data for everyone as a freedom of information requirement. It looks like the old timers are doing all the work and reporting to the forum and the newbies just can not believe the facts but don't have the commitment to follow up on what they question. I guess the negative oldtimers will have to continue to carry the load. I don't need to call Mike because I have seen the actual report and know that LOR numbers are taken from the most credible source. LOR and Ed have made immeasurable contributions to this forum by hardnosed research and reported it with candor not the "smoke" of a promoter the oldtimers feel an obligation to share the facts and unvarnished truth not hype. We expect management to keep us informed at all times and we do not excuse disingenuious and misleading statements by management as typical of Venture exchange companies and better than most as naturalperson "super gambler/investor" suggests we should. We hold Jacobs to the same standard that should be required from any publicly held company. We all believe that Pyng the product will succeed and reward us that is why we stay invested but we are not going to blow smoke up new/ prospective investors butt to try and help that along. Regards Jack

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next