SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Expirationless Options (XPOs)- The Next Big Thing
XPO 141.09+0.7%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext  
To: Casaubon who wrote (54)8/23/2005 11:14:38 AM
From: VLD3   of 60
 
The literature by Samuelson, Merton, Black, Scholes, ad infinitum state that a "perpetual warrant" at all strike prices have the same price as the underlying. You don't have to go to the thinly traded, deep-in-the-money strikes to get maximum return - according to the academics.

Is this correct? No, but that's a different issue.

The argument for taxation of deep-in-the-money calls only applies when you have eliminated the risk of loss, such as a deep-in-the-money call in combination with the underlying (at a strike less than your basis in the stock).

If the financial outcome is uncertain, it is not a taxable event since you cannot state for certain whether the outcome is a gain or a loss.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext