SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill8/23/2005 6:09:55 PM
  Read Replies (2) of 793756
 
Preliminary thoughts on the emerging Iraqi constitution
Powerline

There will be much hand-wringing about whether the draft Iraqi constitution creates a theocracy, sells out womens' rights, and so forth. A good deal of the hand-wringing will come from those who wanted to leave Iraq in the hands of a murderous dictator (a dictator some are starting to praise for his attention to womens' rights), and those who would have had us pull out of Iraq without paying any attention to what kind of governmental arrangement we left behind. Nonetheless, the underlying issues are certainly fair game for those who address them in good faith.

It's premature to assess with any confidence the strengths and weaknesses of the draft constitution. As I understand the situation, the draft is still being revised and there is still no authoritative translation. However, as Rich Lowry at NRO's Corner points out, the draft constitution appears to follow the Afghanistan constitution on issues of religion and personal rights. Like that document, the draft provides that no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam, but also contains strong human rights protections. (In Afghanistan these protections are facilitating the emergence of a peaceful and vibrant democracy; whether the same words would yield the same result in Iraq remains to be seen, but not because the words are defective). The Iraqi draft states that "no law shall be enacted that contradicts [Islam's] established provisions, the principles of democracy, [or] the rights and basic freedoms stipulated in this constitution." This, I understand, is actually a better formulation than Afghanistan's model. Moreover, when it comes to stipulating the basic freedoms, the same provision apparently protects "all the religious rights of all individuals in the freedom of belief and religious practice." And Islam is declared to be "a" - not "the"- source of legislation. I don't see how, from a secularist standpoint, one could expect better language in a country like Iraq.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext