Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (134177)	8/24/2005 5:52:06 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793725

There is simply no true advice that can be nasty or untoward when the point of it involves saving anothers life. Doctors are about saving lives. Giving advice is one of the actions they take to that end, as are surgery, splinting, medication, etc. If a doctor intends to save the life of a patient having a heart attack by administering a shot of penicillin or splinting his arm, would you oppose questioning his judgment in how he was treating the patient just because his intention is to save her life? Good intentions do not guarantee good results. Doctors are sometimes not knowledgeable or skilled or present enough and they do make mistakes. Nasty or untoward advice probably isn't the best of doctoring. Oh, yeah, it's OK that he put a splint on a heart attack victim because he meant well? He gets some points for meaning well, but the board still may have something to say about his competence.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next