Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (134265)	8/24/2005 7:49:41 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 793964

What if he refuses and than they yank his license. It will be interesting to see if he takes it that far. I imagine that he might cave if he actually faces losing the license. But what I meant by the question was, would you than consider it a legal matter? (Side note on grammar and punctuation. If should that last sentence end in with a question mark? Is it a statement not a question? Does anyone care :) Reminds me of Michael Graham who got fired from WMAL for refusing to smooth things over, not for what he said that triggered the incident. But getting fired is not a legal matter. Michael Graham can go in to business for himself or try to find someone else to hire him. He isn't locked out of his profession. Sort of like getting impeached for telling a lie rather than for what one lied about. Not really very much like that. Perjury is a crime. (Definitely a legal matter, in fact its a crime only because it is a legal matter, ordinary lying is not a crime) Also in this case the doctor faces possible punishment for the original crime. Apology, or sensitivity training might be allowed instead of official punishment but the "crime" is the original action. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next