Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (169935)	8/26/2005 4:46:30 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 281500

"Now, if you want to tell me all the "gains" you think we've made and will make as a result of our bloody adventure in Iraq, " I am open to such a discussion but that comment certainly does not reflect the content of these past few posts. "If, however, you want to continue to believe that the people who think like you understand the danger and the rest of us are ignoring it, or care more about politics or whatever, then that's fine too, only don't expect me to waste my time. I absolutely do believe that and it is further verified for me on a daily basis. That was the point of my original post and you have confirmed for me that you would prefer to ignore the substantive dangers developing in Iraq in favor of continued discussion on the emaciated path of lw/rw demagoguery. >>>...By the way, you say; "I read some of the comments Cindy made about her hopes for upcoming elections>" like that's a bad thing. You asked the question about why I thought you and Cindy were ranting about a 'Big Picture' that doesn't connect to your narrow small picture view, and I explained it for you. You've just validated that view. Thanks, and there is nothing wrong with the democratic process.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next