Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Moominoid who wrote (68236)	8/28/2005 9:07:49 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) of 74559

You're right, we definitely are not within the historical normal range for CO2. The more serious indicator to me is the increasing acidity of the oceans from higher levels of dissolved carbon dioxide. We are exceeding the capacity of the environment to process carbon dioxide into oxygen. If people wish to use fuel which emits less carbon, the least expensive place to do this is at the oil refinery. If we chose to do so, refineries could produce fuel with less carbon, or could even produce hydrogen alone. Of course, much of the potential energy contained in each barrel of crude oil would be forfeited as each refinery truck it to the dump in the form of unburned carbon. But this would be far less expensive than lunatic schemes to extract the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere after it is combusted. The end result would be a huge need for additional energy from forms which do not release carbon. Various forms of heavy oil, abundant but not yet in wide use, has an even larger ratio of carbon to hydrogen - as does coal. .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next