Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (135218)	8/30/2005 12:49:29 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) of 793561

The fact of the matter is that not everyone can handle the losses associated with these disasters. My insurance will take care of me, but there are countless others who will be seriously affected who cannot afford the coverage I have and who will be much more damaged than I will be. Perhaps you are prepared to let them suffer; I'm not. If it takes tax money to do it, so be it. like i said, this is a big, big country, some parts are much more prone to getting 'hammered' than others....and i see james bowers properly pointed out the federal (taxpayer) underwriting of the rebuilding of these locations simply enables those who are otherwise (------->REAL WORLD) unable to afford it, do so.... there's a saying 'if you have to ask how much, you can't afford it' if a person living in a flood prone area cannot afford the REAL cost of insurance to live there, then they should be moving to higher ground and btw, do you think building and rebuilding in flood plain and moving people back in only to suffer yet again, a compassionate thing to do? i don't

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next