SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (135723)8/31/2005 12:47:04 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
I saw the PBS piece the interview came from, and read Barry's book. And, seriously, this thing you just said is not the case:

Were it not for those levees NO would not be a 'bowl'

Partly true, but for the purposes of today's flood, irrelevant.

The Mississippi River levees did not make New Orleans a bowl. They form one side of the bowl, but the levees along the lakes and bayous and canals form other sides.

New Orleans was a bowl to begin with, surrounded by high land caused by silt deposits left over from periodic flooding.

Man has raised the height of the levees.

Could the water have flowed out naturally to the Mississippi if the Mississippi levee was not as high? No, not yet. The natural levee was higher than the water has got to yet.

If all the Mississippi River water went through the Atchafalaya, that would not lower Lake Pontchartrain.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News