2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (164)	8/31/2005 2:07:13 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) of 217591

<<More importantly, it obviously doesn't include the cost of the Coal.>> He said coal cost would be the equivalent to $35 per barrel of oil....So if you add a buck to that it's still the cheapest solution. As to the buck I don't think he wuz making this up. The plant is going to happen and they aren't doing it on guess work. Anyway the cost of the product ain't as important as the availability of the resource. We are fast running out of oil and our dependence on Mid East oil can do nothing but grow and is clearly a prescription for disaster.... An economic nightmare in the making..... Anyway you look at it the world wide supplies are running out. China ain't buying all the reserves they can cauz they are stupid.....Coal we got.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next