SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (5406)9/2/2005 12:31:56 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
THIS is the real issue that Roberts is gonna make VERY SCARY...
basically to GUT the entire ability of the Federal govt to PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT and it's ANIMALS....of course WE being animals as well
US Sued over Toad at Center of Roberts' Case
By Dan Whitcomb
Reuters

Wednesday 31 August 2005

Los Angeles - An environmental group and a Christian prayer network have joined forces to sue the Bush administration over the fate of an endangered toad - the same "hapless" amphibian at the center of a legal opinion by US Supreme Court nominee John Roberts.

The Center for Biological Diversity and Christians Caring for Creation claim in their federal lawsuit that the US Fish and Wildlife Service has failed to protect the California habitat of the endangered arroyo toad.

Roberts issued an opinion in a separate case involving the arroyo toad in 2003, while sitting as a judge in the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, an opinion that has been criticized by liberal groups as evidence of his "radical" views on states rights and environmental laws.

In that case an appeals court found the federal government could use the Endangered Species Act to stop a developer from building on land that had been designated part of the arroyo toad's habitat.

Roberts disagreed, questioning whether "a hapless toad that, for reasons of its own, lives its entire life in California," could be subject to federal laws. He suggested that it should be up to California legislators to protect the toad.

The current lawsuit, filed last week in Riverside, California, claims that in cutting the number of acres set aside for the toad from 478,000 to 12,000 in April, the Fish and Wildlife Service has threatened to drive the toad into extinction.

A spokeswoman for the US Department of the Interior, which oversees the the Fish and Wildlife Service, could not be reached for comment.

"It's an unfortunate commentary on the willingness of this administration to undermine the Endangered Species Act," said David Hogan, a spokesman for the Center for Biological Diversity. "Despite its small size this toad needs a lot of land to complete its life cycle."

Hogan said the center has been working since 1999 to save the arroyo toad and called it a coincidence that the amphibian has also surfaced in the debate over Roberts' nomination - but added the group was happy to take advantage of that to gain publicity for their issue.

They have named their Web site devoted to the issue Hapless Toad (www.haplesstoad.com) - a reference to an aside by the justice in his dissenting opinion on the 2003 case.

The liberal People From the American Way, which has opposed Roberts' nomination, has said his "radical" view on the toad case could extend far beyond environmental laws to areas of federal authority including Medicare and Social Security.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext