Thanks for the Additional **B.S.** Natural-p
as it happens, I run a "manufacturing company" as President and CEO and we are ISO9001 approved. I am fully aware of what that all means and I STILL say that the record clearly shows that PYNG shies away from informing investors on such problems for far too long! On the other hand, I agree with you that IN THIS CASE it would appear on the surface that PYNG may have the FDA problem under control as I have not been able to find any **independent** evidence on the FDA website or elsewhere to indicate otherwise. As I have said all along, I believe that PYNG has a GREAT product and a lack luster management team that may EVENTUALLY return value to shareholders ..... or at least to the children or grand children of the L-O-N-G term investor. Hence my "strong by" rating which HARDLY can be interpreted by readers as the "fear mongering" you accuse me of. As for joining you and p-islander as warm and fuzzy lap dogs for PYNG's Flounder and Chief, I am afraid PYNG will have to smarten up significantly as regards both it's PR and (apparantly) it's military sales efforts before I consider any further HUGE investment to supplement my aready sizeable share holdings. However, modest buying (should the price drop a tad IS a possibility)....... Of course, through your rose coloured glasses I KNOW my approach can only be seen as unnecessarily cautious.....but as you have said I am an older investor while no doubt you, as a young pup, are still trying hard to dry the area behind both of your ears..... Give yourself time and you MAY mature enough to see that the ED's, Jacks, mf160's, Stangs, esxtarus, oldargus and other factual posters are just trying to keep you and p-islander out of "doggie-do".
Have a GREAT day!
LOR |
