Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SI Bob who wrote (92425)	9/8/2005 9:30:59 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) of 122087

A $12 million "disgorgement" for $41k of alleged ill-gotten gains. Deciding whether someone is guilty or innocent is all in the context of the (supposedly) applicable law. For example, if a judge tells a jury that walking even a foot outside a crosswalk constitutes jaywalking, you really have no choice but to find someone guilty if they did that. If the judge then says said person, by law, should pay a fine commensurate with the number of people that then followed his lead and walked a foot outside the line then the money owed could be considerable. In other words, the interesting part of the Elgindy case is how the judge said the law should be applied. That's what makes this case so alarming, regardless of what you might think of Tony personally. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next