SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (40080)9/11/2005 4:10:24 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
"If we do get impatient and drive across the border to put out hard cash--how is that different than what Americans are doing?"

Many Americans use emergent health care instead of insurance because of the subsidies that allow them to avoid both the insurance premiums and the health care costs. The difference is that our government subsidies them. Is this in effect different than your system? Those who claim there are 50 million Americans without health care clearly do not understand the subject upon which they are corresponding. I generally do not care to correspond with those who prefer to remain ignorant.

Many Americans pay cash for procedures not covered by their insurance. In America people have a choice as to what kind of coverage they prefer. One can spend more for better coverage, or save money and risk having a lower standard of care.

One of the major drivers in American medical care expense is the cost of personal injury litigation. Practicing defensive medicine is expensive. Malpractice premiums are often too high.

Another additive to our medical costs are the free loaders from other countries that fail to pay a fair share of the research and development costs for new drugs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext