International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: terry kennedy who wrote (20548)	9/11/1997 1:01:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	of 35569

The obvious is why not go ahead and release the gold reports from BD and at the end of september release the Bateman report? There are actually three parts to the release: 1) Mining & Minerals injunction. Minor news and known here for several days. 2) Bateman added to team. Major & good. 3) Another report delay. Major & bad. Why did IPM wait until now to do the AU and PT together? It's not like the PT was just now discovered on the property! It makes no sense to delay. It is a poor decision, IMO, to wait another two to three weeks to release the AU and PT reports together if the AU is ready and is good. Therefore either the AU report is not ready or not good, or IPM has made another poor decision. I bet the gold numbers won't be has high as expected. Steffy et. al. will say: "Yet another delay in a sequence of several announced on September 11 by IPM. As in some past announcements this delay is being blamed on an increase in the content of the report." Come on, IPM. Finish something for a change instead of always expanding and never finishing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next