SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (42930)9/18/2005 8:48:26 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) of 93284
 
And you say there is nothing contradictory???? LOL

That's correct, there is nothing contradictory in those statements. Throwing money at an arm of the government does not mean that the spending priorities are correct. The Congress [most notably the GOP Congress] has an excellent record of throwing pork in all the appropriation bills. A recent high profile example is the $200M bridge to Gravina Island in Alaska [population, a whopping 50]. Does that suggest to you that there are no other higher transporation priorites than to build a $200M bridge to an island of 50 people?

Further, from reading the excerpts, it's pretty clear that each editorial had a different emphasis. The NYT had spelled out it's opinion that it wasn't wise to have programs [flood control and federal flood insurance] that encouraged building in high risk areas. But it did acknowledge that flood control was necessary in certain areas which were already heavily populated.

jttmab
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News