John, cool post.
While I don't read Wildest's posts
everyday, I should, for their liter-
ary structure and whimsy, as well
as for their bio-technical ele-
ments, some of which surpass my
sadly limited horizons.
How you guys zero in, and then
drill down, on some of these smal-
ler plays really amazes me. Absent
a compelling reason to believe in
the science of the early stages--by
definition without yet having the
proof of concept or clinical support
to buoy your belief and your bets--
what clinches the pied piper's muse?
Still more, at these early stages is
not there plenty of room for these
pipers to be unreliable, if not down-
right unsavory, managers, where the
clinical trials might reveal flaws
in the story?
Amazing.
quid |
