SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Neutral Corner

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rambi who wrote (186)9/21/2005 8:37:15 AM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (1) of 2253
 
Thought you might be interested in economist Megan McArdle's take on the airline industry, which I believe probably mirrors the views expressed in your family.

Whither aviation?

Why can't the airlines seem to get it together?

Three reasons, seemingly. First, the labour model is terrible. They are saddled with pensions promises they made back when the industry was heavily regulated and airlines were basically allowed to operate on a cost-plus basis. They have multiple, militant unions, none of whom have any incentive to leave any value on the table at negotiating time because they justifiably fear that anything they leave at the negotiating table will simply be claimed by another union. And the unions, plagued by loss aversion, will generally not give up enough in downturns to make the airline profitable unless they are ordered to by a bankruptcy judge.

Second of all, the business model is terrible. Airlines have a very high fixed cost, which is the cost of flying even if you don't carry any passengers, and a very low marginal cost, which is the cost of carrying each additional passenger. The temptation for airlines to sell empty "extra" seats at a very low price is extremely high. But every time one airline does this, it makes it that much harder for competitors to operate at a profit. Because so many of the costs are fixed, companies seem to enter a competitive death spiral, where everyone is desperately trying to dig themselves out of the hole as best they can by selling their product below cost. Also, the "hub-and-spoke" model, which makes it easy to get connecting flights, is much less profitable than the point-to-point model competitors use, cherry-picking only the most lucrative routes. And the airlines are hugely vulnerable to swings in the price of fuel.

Third, the legal model sucks. Easy bankruptcy is a very fine thing for the economy as a whole, but for industries like airlines, which because of the high-fixed/low-marginal cost thing already tend to be plagued by overcapacity, it's a disaster. Creditors would almost always rather keep the hulk running in the hopes of getting some cash out down the road than liquidate, especially because most of an airline's major assets, like planes, tend to be secured, leaving precious little for hungry debtees. So they rehabilitate the business with radically reduced debt and labour obligations. But this doesn't remove the excess capacity that makes it hard for anyone to make a profit; in fact, it makes the rehabilitated business more competitive, which pushes other companies into bankruptcy.

Is there hope? Transportation seems to be an iffy business; railroads as an industry never made a dime for their owners. Certainly, if I were an airline employee, I'd be looking into acquiring some new skills.

janegalt.net
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext