Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (139822)	9/21/2005 10:17:24 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (6) of 793964

The whole global warming discussion is a bit dreamlike. The biggest contributor to global warming is excess carbon dioxide. That debate is over, IMO. The problem is not characterizing rational people who look dispassionately at the data as kooks. Politics--on either side of the divide--and science don't mix and shouldn't be mixed. Excess CO2 has been accumulating since the Industrial Revolution began. Processing excess CO2 out of the atmosphere naturally so that it becomes a solid takes literally decades and perhaps as much as a century. Excess CO2 has been on a hockey stick rise since the 1960s and is now out of control. It will take almost a century to process it. Unless we figure out a technological way to capture CO2 into a solid very quickly and very effectively and on a massive scale, we could stop all industrial and natural processes which emit CO2 to zero levels and it would not make any difference for a very, very long time. Find a company that has figured out how to take CO2 out of the atmosphere quickly and on a massive scale, invest in it, and your QCOM investment will seem paltry by comparison.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next