SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (140220)9/24/2005 4:19:20 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 794413
 
I am not saaying that the science is inconclusive at all.

I am saying that both sides of the global warming debate are likely correct but that there is nothing to be done with respect to warming caused by natural cycles. There is a lot to be done with respect to warming caused by human activities. The carbon dioxide gathering artificial trees someone linked seem like a terrific idea and cheap to implement to boot.

We need to reduce our reliance on oil not only because most of it is foreign but also because it makes environmental sense. A rare instance when environmentalism and sound foreign and national security interests coincide.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News