The greens, not finding someone who paid for their skills, joined academia. Now we have environmentalist teaching at the univerities. This is bad. Very bad!
I am doing my research in food production and then came across an article:
This report focuses on the interdependency of land, food, and population in the U.S. economy. The United States is in a privileged situation compared to other nations in the world: the per capita endowment of natural resources is relatively high because of the relatively low population density. At the same time, the United States is seriously risking loosing this privilege if more attention is not given to the control of population growth (including immigration), the sustainable management of natural resources, and the development of alternative energy sources.
The aim of this report is to increase the awareness of policy makers and the public of the importance of the interaction between population growth, self-sufficiency in food production, standard of living and, ultimately, national security.
I thought: Which idiot would write such non-sense: There was the name David Pimentel.
I had come across his name in several articles gainst ethanol. The guy call himself an ecologist.
That's now the novel name of what they teach life sciences and agriculture.
"Ethanol production in the United States does not benefit the nation's energy security, its agriculture, economy or the environment," says Pimentel. "Ethanol production requires large fossil energy input, and therefore, it is contributing to oil and natural gas imports and U.S. deficits."
here is where he gives himself up:
He says the country should instead focus its efforts on producing electrical energy from photovoltaic cells, wind power and burning biomass and producing fuel from hydrogen conversion.
We are going to eat those guys for breakfast!! |
