International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bijan Khazri who wrote (20594)	9/11/1997 6:22:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	of 35569

I'm a little surprised that C L treated you so courtesously. It should be apparent to anyone who thinks this out that the delays aren't IPM's fault. Their personell can't get within 15 feet of anything that's being done. BD/Bateman are doing the work and when they get done with it -- they'll furnish a report to IPM and they'll let us know how it came out. Raising hell with the company or calling them idiots isn't going to help anything. A lot of the stockholders that post on this thread want instant gratification and that's not the way it works. The company has been stuggling with this situation for 3 years. They've made a big mistake by bowing to stockholder pressure to 'keep everyone informed'. They try to comply, release expected dates and have to bear the brunt of it when the dates don't work out. Every body would be better served if they said a lot less-not more.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next