SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors
AMTX 1.510-7.4%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: srvhap who wrote (24667)9/11/1997 7:01:00 PM
From: pat mudge   of 31386
 
[Putting it all together]

<<< ADI and ALA along with MOT and maybe even TI are finding that the silicon end of the DSP for a single chip is formidable. But, once
Westell gets the same set of chips, at the same time, that Amati gets from MOT, what do you think is going to give Westell problems?>>>

You pose a very good question. First of all, as of today Westell is depending on CG and Amati isn't. No contest. Now, if Westell chooses to buy TI's chip with Amati's algorithms, they'll have to pay some pretty hefty premiums. A basic DMT-ANSI-compliant solution is one thing, to get all the whistles and bells it's another. Let's assume Westell springs for the Ferrari, they will still have to integrate the chips with a DSLAM and have a cost disadvantage while they're at it. I believe they'll do it. Don't get me wrong.

In the long run, it will serve Amati well if Westell uses either of their DMT solutions --- CG or C6X --- as it will seed the market and get all those cousins speaking the same language. As my engineer-friend put it, "Amati not only will sell cakes and flour but control the price of the flour."

I know there are many others who can explain this better than I can. I encourage them all to jump in and take it away.

Cheers!

Pat
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext