Vanteck (vrb-cdnx, vttcf) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Vanteck (vrb-cdnx, vttcf)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gg cox who wrote (221)	9/25/2005 11:03:38 PM
From: Larry S.	Read Replies (2) of 413

GG, Yes, I agree that no battery alone will solve the problem of the reduction in voltage as discharge occurs but, as I indicated, the electronics that is used with our redox technology does. However, the point I was trying to make was that because our redox technology permits essentially unlimited total discharges without failure, it can be augmented with voltage regulation electronics to extract all of the energy stored (total discharge). Therefore, while it doesn't quite match the lead acid technology in the total watt-hours per unit of volume, it exceeds it in real applications where repeated charge and discharges is required. You may well be right about Bishop's limited impact on the stock price but I believe the set back we took last week was due to the disappointment of some investors who were expecting a major contract. A majority of investors today seem to believe a month is long term and don't get excited by something that isn't likely to yield revenue for more than a year even if the eventual return could be very large. Larry

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next