SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : 5spl

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TimF9/27/2005 5:39:13 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 2534
 
Sweet and Lowdown
WSJ.com
September 26, 2005; Page A18

During the Cafta trade debate we wrote that the U.S. sugar program, pound for pound, might be the most destructive policy in Washington. Turns out it may also be the dumbest.

By the time of passage, Cafta allowed a modest increase in imports from the Caribbean, which set off wails of impending catastrophe from the sugar-growing interests here. Guess what? The U.S. this year is facing a shortage of sugar. And next year, too -- and that's before we know the damage that Katrina has done to the 2005 crop.

It turns out Cafta's new import levels are too small. So we're going to have to import more sugar this year and more than Cafta allows next year to avoid an unpleasant price spike for consumers and damage to the $225 billion U.S. sugar-using industries. There's only one place where we'd have thought you could produce anything so ludicrous as a sugar shortage, and that's the old Soviet Union. Well, that's pretty close to what we've got...

Message 21736755
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext