SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (67675)9/29/2005 8:41:00 AM
From: OrcastraiterRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
Bush's first reason for taking over Iraq was economic. There was no threat from Iraq. No WMD.

O'Niel's statements are clear on that. And he is clear on what the discussion was in the National Security Council. Planning for regime change. For pre-emptive war. It's clear that the plan to do so was discussed from day one...well before 9-11.

It's also clear that this administration is made up of a cabal of members of the PNAC, who's goal is global domination by the United States. Who's tools include military force. The stated goal was to invade Iraq, to secure the oil fields. They even stated that some "event" such as a "Pearl Harbor" would be needed to justify such an attack to the American people. These are the words of the the neocons that found themselves in control of our government after 2000. They've been driving the nation into the ground ever since.

No doubt that 9-11 served as a "Pearl Harbor" like event for the neocons. I did not suggest that it was a conspiracy. That was your injection. Perhaps you are disturbed by the many unanswered questions regarding the events of 9-11. We all should be.

Orca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext