Chris, whether 100 or 100,000 women can beat you or me is irrelevant to what I was explaining and doesn't disprove it.
Women are definitely inferior to men in all sorts of ways. One of them is in world championship chess. Not to mention maths, physics, golf, and anything requiring big, fast muscles.
Their brains on average mature 3 years younger. That has a permanent effect. Since the early years are crucial development years, once gone never retrieved, it's pretty obvious that there are consequences from the early development.
Women are also superior in various ways. For a start, they are less poisoned by testosterone. They have 4x the corpus collosum connections [apparently]. They are quite a lot better at having children. They are better looking. They have physiological advantages in g-force resistance [if I remember rightly] and flexibility leaves males for dead [just as well with fitting those big babies out]. They also mature younger which must have some evolutionary advantage [such as being old enough to have sex at a younger age; that is so cool]. They live longer too, but I suspect that's more to do with high-risk male MADness such as playing chicken, boozing and generally taking risks, than with physiological differences.
< Women are certainly different from men, but I think they are in no way inferior. Now that they've got a chance to show what they can do, you may be proven a total idiot in the near future.>
I think you have already been shown to be a complete moron. Anyway, kidding aside, I don't think that having a theory shown to be wrong makes the person suggesting it a total idiot. I'd offer a bet with a large sum of money on who is right, but I know you'd weasel your way out. First though, you'd have to understand what my actual points are and not say things which show you don't know what I mean. The first two sentences are irrelevant:
<I'm a former tournament chessplayer, and I can guarantee you there are many women who can kick both our asses. In my own case, from experience. I had one beat me, 23 other men and one other woman at the same time in a simul.
susanpolgar.com
Remember, reliable, available birth control and lack of rape on demand are fairly recent inventions in the history of the accomplishments of mankind. When you've got a gang of kids to raise, the higher accomplishemnts may be abandoned, to the credit of women.>
What higher accomplishment is there available to most women than doing a good job of producing children? Rule number one of evolution = succeed with the next generation and the generations after that. I don't think you should denigrate women and children like that.
Mqurice |
