SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (141304)10/2/2005 8:45:08 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 793905
 
A terrific rant, but scientifically unsupportable.

Global use of fossil fuels over the last century replaces easily the amount of CO2 which is processed by nature. This is precisely why scientists are measuring increased CO2 over the levels recorded since it has been measured. As the processing of CO2 over time by nature is the linchpin of your argument, I must unfortunately rain, not snow, on your parade.

You have also not noted the increased solar radiation which has according to the latest studies has in concert with increased greenhouse gasses contributed to global warming. As I suspected, it increasingly appears that both natural and human processes are at work.

It cannot get freezing cold if the sun is mercilessly beating on us at an increased rate.

Sorry.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News