SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (171803)10/3/2005 7:39:33 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
<I'm not inclined to think of the individual act of DNA twiddling to be ethically wrong, but it'll make an interesting society, wealthy people will be in a better position to twiddle. Poor people will be stuck with what they got.>

That's pretty much what happens now. Women select DNA from that on offer and that goes on to be the next generation. Wealthy people have wider choices, other things being equal.

Whether women do it by ticking a menu before conceiving from a DNA chart and somebody clips and unclips DNA, or she scavenges around in the swarm of males on offer looking for a decent bundle of DNA, the outcome is much the same. But it's less efficient in the manual method.

I'm sure women will select some bloke, then go through his DNA saying to "Unplug that and put in this". They will universally want some intelligence plugged in. If we take them at their word and the Flynn Effect and the fact that humans are smarter than chimps is a good guide that they have been wanting intelligence for a longgggg time. It's not all they want, but other things being equal, they'll grab it.

Intelligence testers got around the cultural bias issues in testing decades ago. Belts and braces questions aren't messing testing up these days.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext